Login | Users Online: 331  
Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size   
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 33-36

The efficacy of hydration with normal saline versus hydration with sodium bicarbonate in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy


Department of Madani Heart Centre, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran

Correspondence Address:
Farzad Ilkhchooyi
Cardiovascular Research Centre, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1995-705X.137489

Rights and Permissions

Background: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury [contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN)] is one of the major causes of hospital-acquired acute renal failure. Volume supplementation is the most effective strategy to prevent acute renal failure caused by contrast; but the effects of sodium bicarbonate regimens are unknown in CIN prevention. The aim of this survey is to compare the efficacy of hydration with normal saline versus hydration with sodium bicarbonate in the prevention of the CIN in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Materials and Methods: In a clinical trial, 350 patients undergoing coronary interventions were randomized into two groups: One group received normal saline and another group received sodium bicarbonate before and after infusion of the contrast. Patients in both the groups had received N-acetylcysteine. CIN was defined as relative increase in serum creatinine equal to or more than 25% of baseline or increase to 0.5 mg/dl in 48 h after the injection of the contrast. Results: CIN was seen in 46 patients (13.1%) after coronary interventions. Incidence of CIN in patients receiving normal saline (19.4%) was more than in patients receiving sodium bicarbonate (6.9%) (P = 0.001). Hemodialysis was needed only in one patient who received saline normal. Relative risk to induce CIN in both groups was as 2.8 and was in the range of 1.50-5.25 with confidence interval of 95% and P = 0.001. Thus, the probability of CIN was significantly more in the usage of normal saline. Conclusion: This survey showed that hydration with sodium bicarbonate is superior to hydration with normal saline and has better protection effects.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3027    
    Printed69    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded283    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 9    

Recommend this journal