Login | Users Online: 623  
Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size   
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us
 


 
Table of Contents
CASE REPORT
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 16  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 34-36  

Saphenous Vein Graft Perforation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - A Nightmare to be Avoided


Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Date of Web Publication11-Mar-2015

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Surender Deora
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Sheth Vadilal Sarabhai General Hospital, Smt. Nathiba Hargovandas Lakhmichand Municipal Medical College, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad - 380 006, Gujarat
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1995-705X.153000

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) is challenging and is associated with adverse short- and long-term clinical outcome as compared to native coronary arteries. SVG perforation is rare but catastrophic and needs immediate attention. Various factors predisposing for SVG perforation are old degenerated graft, ulcerated plaque, severe fibrotic, or calcified lesion necessitating high pressure balloon or stent inflation, use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or other atheroablative devices. Management includes prolonged balloon occlusion, reversal of anticoagulation, use of covered stent, and emergency pericadiocentesis if required.

Keywords: Covered stent, perforation, saphenous vein graft, undersized stent


How to cite this article:
Deora S, Shah SC, Patel TM. Saphenous Vein Graft Perforation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - A Nightmare to be Avoided. Heart Views 2015;16:34-6

How to cite this URL:
Deora S, Shah SC, Patel TM. Saphenous Vein Graft Perforation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - A Nightmare to be Avoided. Heart Views [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Jul 21];16:34-6. Available from: http://www.heartviews.org/text.asp?2015/16/1/34/153000


   Introduction Top


Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions has higher complication rates and poor long-term outcomes as compared to native coronaries. [1] The perioperative complications may include no-reflow, abrupt closure, distal embolization causing perioperative myocardial infarction and rarely SVG perforation. Here, we report a case of SVG perforation managed successfully with a covered stent and discuss about its predictors and management.


   Case Report Top


A 76-year-old male known case of hypertension and diabetes mellitus was admitted to our institute with complaints of crescendo angina and dyspnea for 1 week. He had undergone coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to left anterior descending (LAD) artery, radial artery graft to right coronary artery (RCA), and SVG to obtuse marginal (OM) artery 9 years ago and PCI to SVG-OM graft with drug-eluting stent 2 years ago. 12-lead resting electrocardiogram revealed significant ST depressions in V4-V6, lead I and aVL. Two-dimensional (2D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was normal with normal left ventricular systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ~ 60%). Serum biochemistry was within normal limits except significantly raised cardiac enzymes and troponins.

After informed consent, coronary angiography by right transradial approach revealed native triple vessel disease, patent LIMA-LAD graft, patent radial-RCA graft, and significant short discrete eccentric lesion in SVG-OM graft distal to the patent stent [arrow, [Figure 1]a; S Video 1]. PCI to SVG-OM graft was planned and the ostium was cannulated with JR4/6F guide catheter, but was exchanged with AR2/6F guide catheter (Launcher, Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN) for better backup support. The lesion was crossed with 0.014" whisper guide wire (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) and the direct stenting was planned. The stent 3.5 × 18 mm Xience Pro (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) was positioned across the lesion (arrow, [Figure 1]b). While inflating the stent at 14 atmosphere, there was sudden extravasation of contrast revealing class III perforation at the stent site [arrow, [Figure 2]; S Video 2]. Immediately, the perforation was occluded proximally with the same stent balloon. TTE revealed minimal pericardial effusion without any clinical or echocardiographic evidence of cardiac tamponade. Even after prolonged balloon inflation there was still persistent leakage and therefore, the perforation was sealed with 3 × 18 mm covered stent at 12 atmosphere (Jostent Graftmaster, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) with TIMI III flow [Figure 3]; S Video 3]. Patient remained hemodynamically stable during the procedure and hospital stay and was aymptomatic at 1-month follow-up.
Figure 1: Angiogram revealing significant stenosis in saphenous vein graft to major obtuse marginal branch (arrow, Panel A). Angiogram showing drug eluting stent positioned across the lesion (arrow, Panel B)

Click here to view
Figure 2: Angiogram while deploying the drug eluting stent at high pressure causing class III perforation (arrow)

Click here to view
Figure 3: Final angiogram after deployment of covered stent showing complete sealing of the perforation

Click here to view












   Discussion Top


SVG perforation was first reported by Drummer et al., and may be catastrophic if immediate measures are not taken. [2] The predisposing factors for perforation are old degenerated grafts, ulcerated plaque, eccentric fibrotic or calcified lesion, and use of oversized stent. [3] It may be procedure related due to guide wire penetration, subintimal balloon inflation, overexpansion of balloon, or stent and rarely due to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) catheter or during atheroablative procedure.

In a case series of 12 patients with SVG perforation by Marmagkiolis et al., most of them occurred in elderly males with more than 9 years of graft age. [4] The main site of perforation was SVG body and in majority of the cases occurred during stent deployment at high pressure as in our case or during post dilatation. Usually, SVGs perforation does not cause cardiac tamponade because of pericardiotomy during CABG and extrapericardial course of proximal SVGs, but localized tamponade due to extensive pericardial adhesions can occur and may cause persistent hypotension. [5] The hypotension may also be due to continuous hemorrhage into the mediastinum necessitating immediate intervention. Rarely, SVG perforation may occur in right atrium or also may cause localized pulmonary artery compression. [6],[7]

Management of SVG perforation includes immediate balloon occlusion proximal to perforation site, reversal of anticoagulation with protamine, and if needed covered stent. Covered stent should preferably be deployed using dual guide catheter technique to decrease the extravasation of blood during the procedure. [8] Emergency pericardiocentesis and very rarely coil embolization may be needed after covered stent if persistent leakage and hypotension is present. [9] Selection of undersized stent may prevent SVG perforation without increase in 1 year event rate. [10]


   Conclusion Top


PCI to SVGs is a challenge for an interventional cardiologist and needs adequate experience and expertise. SVG perforation is a cardiac emergency and needs immediate intervention. Use of undersized stent and balloons may prevent this fatal complication without compromising short- and long-term results.

 
   References Top

1.
Brilakis ES, Rao SV, Banerjee S, Goldman S, Shunk KA, Holmes DR Jr, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in native arteries versus bypass grafts in prior coronary artery bypass grafting patients: A report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:844-50.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Drummer E, Furey K, Hollman J. Rupture of a saphenous vein bypass graft during coronary angioplasty. Br Heart J 1987;58:78-81.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Myles JL, Ratliff NB, Hollman J, Zaidi A, Tan TB. Mechanisms of vessel injury during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of saphenous vein bypass grafts and coronary arteries. Am J Cardiovasc Pathol 1988;2:133-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Marmagkiolis K, Brilakis ES, Hakeem A, Cilingiroglu M, Bilodeau L. Saphenous vein graft perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention: A case series. J Invasive Cardiol 2013;25:157-61.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Lowe R, Hammond C, Perry RA. Prior CABG does not prevent pericardial tamponade following saphenous vein graft perforation associated with angioplasty. Heart 2005;91:1052.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Astroulakis Z, Mathur A. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Percutaneous intervention to a right coronary artery vein graft complicated by perforation into the right heart. Circulation 2006;114:e549-50.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Poulter RS, Dooris M. Localized pulmonary artery compression due to saphenous vein graft perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. Can J Cardiol 2011;27:389.e25-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Ben-Gal Y, Weisz G, Collins MB, Genereux P, Dangas GD, Teirstein PS, et al. Dual catheter technique for the treatment of severe coronary artery perforations. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010;75:708-12.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Glover B, Johnston P, Spence M. Percutaneous management of a saphenous vein graft perforation using a covered stent and final coil embolization technique. Arch Med Sci 2010;6:991-2.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Hong YJ, Pichard AD, Mintz GS, Kim SW, Lee SY, Kim SY, et al. Outcome of undersized drug-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention of saphenous vein graft lesions. Am J Cardiol 2010;105:179-85.  Back to cited text no. 10
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]


This article has been cited by
1 Coronary bypass graft perforation during percutaneous intervention
Mohammed Andaleeb Chowdhury,Mujeeb Abdul Sheikh
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. 2016; 17(1): 48
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1162    
    Printed19    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded76    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal