Login | Users Online: 840  
Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size   
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us
 


 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 1-5  

Midterm follow-up results of transcatheter interatrial septal defect closure


1 Pediatric Cardiology Research Center, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Yazd Cardiovascular Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

Date of Web Publication7-May-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Mehdi Ghaderian
Pediatric Cardiology Research Center, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/HEARTVIEWS.HEARTVIEWS_32_19

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Objectives: We studied immediate and midterm results of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects (ASDs) using the Amplatzer septal device closure.
Methods: The study included one hundred and thirty-seven patients (31 men, 106 women; mean age 8 ± 7.3 years; range 1–65 years) who underwent transcatheter closure of secundum ASD between October 2014 and October 2016 in our center. All the patients were evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography before and during the procedure and in adult patients; transesophageal echocardiography was performed before the procedure. Closure of ASDs was performed under general anesthesia with transthoracic echocardiographic guidance. Follow-up controls were done on the day after procedure, 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter. The median follow-up periods of ASD was 15 months.
Results: The mean ASD and device size were 13.5 ± 2.3 and 14.3 ± 3.2 mm, respectively. The mean procedural and fluoroscopy times were 21.3 ± 4.7 and 5.1 ± 1.9 min. Immediate complications such as mortality, bleeding, fatal arrhythmia, and device embolization did not occur in any patient during and after the procedure. Cardiac arrhythmias were seen in 4 patients during the 1st month after the procedure. Late device embolization did not occur during the follow-up. No residual shunts were seen after the procedure. Transient ischemic attack was seen in one patient during the procedure and in one patient 2 days after the procedure without long-term complication.
Conclusion: Transcatheter closure of ASDs using the Amplatzer devices is an efficacious and safe therapeutic option.

Keywords: Amplatzer, interatrial septal defect, transcatheter closure


How to cite this article:
Ghaderian M, Sabri MR, Ahmadi AR, Alipour MR, Dehghan B, Mehrpour M. Midterm follow-up results of transcatheter interatrial septal defect closure. Heart Views 2019;20:1-5

How to cite this URL:
Ghaderian M, Sabri MR, Ahmadi AR, Alipour MR, Dehghan B, Mehrpour M. Midterm follow-up results of transcatheter interatrial septal defect closure. Heart Views [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Jun 18];20:1-5. Available from: http://www.heartviews.org/text.asp?2019/20/1/1/257790




   Introduction Top


A trial septal defect (ASD) is one of the most frequent (5%–10%) congenital heart diseases in adults.[1] Some of patients with ASD are free of symptoms although most of them will become symptomatic during their lives. Patients with ASD have a left-to-right shunt and with consequent chronic volume load of the right atrium and right ventricle and pulmonary artery causing heart failure and pulmonary hypertension.

Identification of the atrial defect is important during the life to prevent the different complications such as arrhythmias, pulmonary hypertension, paradoxical embolism, and heart failure.[2],[3]

In patients with significant volume overload in right heart with a shunt ratio >1.5:1 or dilated right atrium or right ventricle during echocardiographic study, atrial septal closure is suggested. During the past decade, percutaneous ASD closure has become approach for most secundum type ASDs among interventional cardiologist, provided the defect has suitable rims.[4],[5]

Compared to surgical closure transcatheter, ASD closure is associated with fewer complications and faster hemodynamic improvement.[6],[7] Decreases in right ventricular volume overload, right ventricular dimensions, and pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) after transcatheter ASD closure result in prominent symptomatic improvement.[2] Residual shunt after ASD closure by surgical or transcatheter approaches may result in volume overload and consequently increased pulmonary circulation.

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common finding in the general population. It has a prevalence of approximately 25%–30%.[8] Patients with PFO who have right-to-left shunt have increased risk of transient ischemic attack (TIA), sleep apnea, migraine, and cryptogenic stroke.[9],[10] Patients without symptoms do not require therapy. Transcatheter device closure in patients with recurrent TIA or stroke has been recommended.

Between 2013 and 2016, transcather closue of secundum type ASD were closed with devices at Chamran Hospital. We investigated the efficacy and safety of transcatheter closure in these patients.


   Methods Top


Patient selection

Between October 2014 and October 2016, one hundred and thirty-seven patients (31 men, 106 women) with a significant ASD, as demonstrated by initial transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before the procedure, were considered for transcatheter closure with the atrial septal occluder (ASO) at our Cardiology Department. Inclusion criteria in our patients with ASD detected by echocardiography for percutaneous device closure were significant left-to-right shunt (Qp/Qs >1.5, measured during catheterization or in echocardiography), right heart dilatation, and increased right ventricular volume load. These patients had symptoms of reduced exercise capacity, dyspnea, tachypnea or paradoxical embolism in physical exam. The defects must have good rims in evaluation before procedure and provided that the defect was at least 5 mm far away from the atrioventricular valves, coronary sinus, right superior and inferior veins, and had not partial anomalous pulmonary vein connection from right superior pulmonary vein to superior vena cava. In patients with good rims and had aortic rim <5 mm percutaneous closure was performed. Patients were excluded from the study if they had sinus venosus or primum-type ASD, coexistent congenital heart disease that need surgical correction, pulmonary vascular resistance >8 Wood units with, or significant mitral or tricuspid regurgitation. Three patients were excluded from our study because of pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery systolic pressure >70 mmHg and pulmonary artery resistance >8 woods). Five patients had not good rims (floppy rims) in procedure during using of sizing balloon. Before the procedure, all the patients were evaluated through transthoracic (TTE). Patients over 30 kg that had suspicious anatomy for ASD referred for TEE. For patients who underwent ASD closure, evaluation of left-to-right shunt by color Doppler echocardiography was performed.

All the procedures were performed in adult patients under local anesthesia and in small patients under deep sedation, with transthoracic guidance throughout. Standard right-heart evaluation and catheterization were done through the right femoral vein for calculation of QP/QS ratio and measurement of PAP and resistance. Main pulmonary artery and right upper pulmonary vein angiography were performed to evaluate of anomalous pulmonary vein connection and atrial septum.

A sizing balloon was inflated at the level of the defect until the waist in the middle of the balloon was seen, but in patients with clear septum in echocardiography, sizing balloon was not used. A device with a waist diameter similar to the stretched ASD diameter in sizing balloon, or 2–3 mm larger than defect by color echocardiography, was chosen. The right femoral vein was used for procedure as the access site. After insertion of sheath into the right femoral vein, 80–100 IU/kg heparin was administered intravenously and for endocarditis prophylaxis, the patients received cefazolin (50–100 mg/kg intravenous [IV]) during the procedure, followed by 100 mg/kg/day IV divided 8 h for an additional 1 day. The selected ASO was deployed at atrial septum through standard protocol. After deployment of device residual shunt was studied by color Doppler echocardiography and right atrium angiography in left anterior oblique position. Pull and pushing maneuver was done and after confidence of stability of ADO, the device was released [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Atrial septal closure: Using sizing balloon for sizing of atrial septal defect diameter (a) and device closure (b)

Click here to view


All patients were monitored for 24 h and discharged the day after the procedure. Evaluation of patients was done in hospital with chest X-ray, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography. To prevent thrombus formation on the device, the patients were discharged on ticlopidine (1 mg/kg/day to maximum dose of 75 mg/day) for 1 month and aspirin (3–5 mg/kg/day to maximum dose of 80 mg/day) for 6 months. Follow-up TTE was performed 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure and annually thereafter. Patients were told to inform us in case of any suspicion of chest discomfort, TIA, stroke, other thromboembolic events, magnetic resonance study, or any hospitalization during their follow-up.

All the data were collected on a set data sheet, collated by a single coordinator. The data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, median, range, and categorical variables were expressed as percentages. Independent samples t-test used for comparisons of continuous variables between the two groups. Categorical variables were analyzed by Chi-square test. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software (version 18.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A P < 0.5 was considered statistically significant.


   Results Top


Patient characteristics are described in [Table 1]. One hundred and thirty-seven patients (31 men, 106 women; mean age 8 ± 7.3 years; range 1–65 years) underwent transcatheter ASD device closure with various devices in our department during this study. The median follow-up periods of patients were 15 months (range 1–26 m). The mean body weight was 19.9 ± 6.5 kg (range = 10–62 kg). The mean ASD and device size were 13.5 ± 2.3 and 14.3 ± 3.2 mm, respectively. The mean procedural and fluoroscopy times were 21.3 ± 4.7 and 5.1 ± 1.9 min. Mean fluoroscopy time has been decreased significantly during the time with the progress in our experience. The pulmonary to systemic shunt ratio (QP/QS) ranged from 1.6 to 3.4 (mean 2.1 ± 0.72). The mean PAP was 24.4 ± 8 mmHg (range = 13–43 mmHg). In our patients, 80% patients presenting with dilated RV and had mean RV-PA gradients (21 ± 4.2 mmHg) that from increased PA flow.
Table 1: Demographic and periprocedural characteristics of the patients

Click here to view


At the end of the procedure, on color flow Doppler echocardiography, residual shunting (including foaming through the device) was seen in 52 (38%) of patients and follow-up echocardiography at the day after procedure, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the procedure showed complete closure rates of 79%, 92%, 97%, and >99%, respectively. One patient had mild residual flow on echocardiographic examination after 1-year follow-up and disappeared gradually during late follow-up. Complications such as device emboli, severe bleeding, arterial or venous injuries, wire fracture, retroperitoneal hematoma, and arteriovenous fistula and mortality was not occurred during the procedures.

Immediately after procedure, a 32-year-old woman had right side hemiparesis and decreased right limbs force. Computed tomography scan showed TIA and mild ischemia and in 1st h, she received TPA and symptoms dissolved during 1st day. Another 1-year-old girl with large ASD (16 mm) had right side hemiparesis and seizure 24 h after procedure and resolved during 1st month.

Major complications related to procedures were not seen. Three patients developed transient ST-elevation, which received more O2 and cleared within a short period; these were attributed to small air emboli to coronary arteries because of their position. Five patients presented with supraventricular tachycardia, which was spontaneously resolved in three patients and was reverted in the 2 other cases with verapamil or adenosin. Three women (range between 35 and 45 years old) had persistent atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia during the 1st month after ASD closure. In these patients, long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm was achieved with propranolol and flecainide, and then, drugs tapered to discontinued. Two patients had transient complete atrioventricular block without symptoms and find in ECG examination in follow-up that length 2 weeks and resolved spontaneously.

At a mean follow-up period of 15 ± 5.5 months (range = 1–26 months), all the defects were completely closed and remained closed afterward. No thrombus formation was seen during the follow-up period. Demographic, periprocedural clinical characteristics and complications of the patients with ASD closure were shown in [Table 1] and [Table 2].
Table 2: Periprocedural complications and follow-up

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Transcatheter ASD closure is recommended in symptomatic patients and in the presence of increased left-to-right shunt (Qp/Qs >1.5), right ventricular dilatation, and paradoxical embolism. Transcatheter closure of ASD has become the standard of care instead of surgical closure in most experienced centers because of fewer psychological impacts, fewer hospital, and have intensive care unit stay duration. Furthermore, it does not surgical myocardial and skin scar and dysrhythmias.[11],[12]

We aimed to present our single-center experience with transcatheter closure of ASD in this report.

Transcatheter closure of the ASD is a safe technique with low incidence of morbidity and mortality. During the procedure, selection of device is the most important decision for operator. An oversized device can cause to erosion of aorta, a rare but serious complication of this and procedure could be seen years after procedure during the follow-up.[13],[14] In our study during the follow-up period, we did not have any cardiac erosion in our patients. We think that our patients were younger and the devices used were smaller. Undersized device selection for ASD closure may result in residual shunting after the procedure and early or even late embolization of the device.[15],[16],[17] Post et al. described four device embolization in their patients; skill or experience in doing the procedure was described by Aytemir et al to have lower device embolization. We did not have any device embolization.

After transcatheter ASD closure because of foaming through the device residual shunting is higher compared to surgical closure, but this shunt decreases during the time.[17],[18] Closure rate varied over 95% during the follow-up depending on the technique used for evaluation.[19] Van de Bruaene reported 94% effective closure in their patients during 5-year follow-up and none of them required reintervention.[20]

In this study, one patient had mild residual shunt after 1-year follow-up and disappeared completely during follow-up. Small residual shunt after transcatheter ASD device closure does not seem to lead to long-term serious problems. Residual shunt after the procedure during the follow-up was seen over 99% at 6 months after the procedure and one patient had mild residual shunt that disappeared gradually during follow-up. Our results similar to other studies that reported high prevalence occlusion after ASD closure.[21],[22]


   Conclusion Top


In our study, transcatheter closure of ASD was effective and safe as an alternative treatment to surgery. For successful device closure, appropriate patient selection is an important factor. Although the immediate and midterm results of transcatheter interventions showed that this procedure had low complication rates and safe compared to surgical approaches, data on long-term results are limited and further studies are needed to complete our knowledge.

Our study had some limitations. The most important limitation is that our findings mainly reflect midterm results about the safety and efficacy of the devices but no long-term follow-up; thus, we could not judge about the safety and long-term complications of this procedure. Another limitation is that it is a single center experience. Multiceneter studies are needed to decrease complications.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Webb G, Gatzoulis MA. Atrial septal defects in the adult: Recent progress and overview. Circulation 2006;114:1645-53.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Pascotto M, Santoro G, Cerrato F, Caputo S, Bigazzi MC, Iacono C, et al. Time-course of cardiac remodeling following transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect. Int J Cardiol 2006;112:348-52.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Balci KG, Balci MM, Aksoy MM, Yilmaz S, Aytürk M, Dogan M, et al. Remodeling process in right and left ventricle after percutaneous atrial septal defect closure in adult patients. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2015;43:250-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
King TD, Thompson SL, Steiner C, Mills NL. Secundum atrial septal defect. Nonoperative closure during cardiac catheterization. JAMA 1976;235:2506-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Masura J, Gavora P, Formanek A, Hijazi ZM. Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects using the new self-centering amplatzer septal occluder: Initial human experience. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997;42:388-93.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Eerola A, Pihkala JI, Boldt T, Mattila IP, Poutanen T, Jokinen E. Hemodynamic improvement is faster after percutaneous ASD closure than after surgery. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;69:432-41.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Du ZD, Hijazi ZM, Kleinman CS, Silverman NH, Larntz K; Amplatzer Investigators. Comparison between transcatheter and surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect in children and adults: Results of a multicenter nonrandomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1836-44.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Marelli AJ, Mackie AS, Ionescu-Ittu R, Rahme E, Pilote L. Congenital heart disease in the general population: Changing prevalence and age distribution. Circulation 2007;115:163-72.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Carroll JD, Saver JL, Thaler DE, Smalling RW, Berry S, MacDonald LA, et al. Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1092-100.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Post MC, Thijs V, Herroelen L, Budts WI. Closure of a patent foramen ovale is associated with a decrease in prevalence of migraine. Neurology 2004;62:1439-40.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Butera G, De Rosa G, Chessa M, Rosti L, Negura DG, Luciane P, et al. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect in young children: Results and follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:241-5.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
O'Byrne ML, Gillespie MJ, Shinohara RT, Dori Y, Rome JJ, Glatz AC. Cost comparison of transcatheter and operative closures of ostium secundum atrial septal defects. Am Heart J 2015;169:727-35.e2.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Crawford GB, Brindis RG, Krucoff MW, Mansalis BP, Carroll JD. Percutaneous atrial septal occluder devices and cardiac erosion: A review of the literature. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012;80:157-67.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Divekar A, Gaamangwe T, Shaikh N, Raabe M, Ducas J. Cardiac perforation after device closure of atrial septal defects with the Amplatzer septal occluder. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1213-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Post MC, Suttorp MJ, Jaarsma W, Plokker HW. Comparison of outcome and complications using different types of devices for percutaneous closure of a secundum atrial septal defect in adults: A single-center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006;67:438-43.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Aytemir K, Oto A, Özkutlu S, Canpolat U, Kaya EB, Yorgun H, et al. Transcatheter interatrial septal defect closure in a large cohort: Midterm follow-up results. Congenit Heart Dis 2013;8:418-27.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Behjati M, Rafiei M, Soltani MH, Emami M, Dehghani M. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect with amplatzer septal occluder in adults: Immediate, short, and intermediate-term results. J Tehran Heart Cent 2011;6:79-84.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Boutin C, Musewe NN, Smallhorn JF, Dyck JD, Kobayashi T, Benson LN. Echocardiographic follow-up of atrial septal defect after catheter closure by double-umbrella device. Circulation 1993;88:621-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Tomar M, Khatri S, Radhakrishnan S, Shrivastava S. Intermediate and long-term followup of percutaneous device closure of fossa ovalis atrial septal defect by the Amplatzer septal occluder in a cohort of 529 patients. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2011;4:22-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Van de Bruaene A, Stroobants D, Benit E. Percutaneous closure of inter-atrial communications (atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale): Single-centre experience and mid-term follow-up. Acta Cardiol 2015;70:133-40.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Patel A, Lopez K, Banerjee A, Joseph A, Cao QL, Hijazi ZM. Transcatheter closure of atr ial septal defects in adults > or =40 years of age: Immediate and follow-up results. J Interv Cardiol 2007;20:82-8.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Godart F, Houeijeh A, Recher M, Francart C, Polge AS, Richardson M, et al. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect with the Figulla(®) ASD Occluder: A comparative study with the Amplatzer(®) Septal Occluder. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2015;108:57-63.  Back to cited text no. 22
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed246    
    Printed22    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded15    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal