|
| CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE |
|
| Year : 2002 | Volume
: 3
| Issue : 2 | Page : 8 |
 |
|
Congenital heart disease - D: Congenital aortic regurgitation
B.J M Delemarre
Department of Cardiology, Hospital Leyenburg, the Hague, The Netherlands
| Date of Web Publication | 22-Jun-2010 |
Correspondence Address:
B.J M Delemarre
Department of Cardiology, Hospital Leyenburg, the Hague
The Netherlands
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
How to cite this article:
Delemarre BM. Congenital heart disease - D: Congenital aortic regurgitation. Heart Views 2002;3:8 |
 Introduction | |  |
Abnormal aortic valve development is one of the most threatening congenital heart diseases. Like a thief in the night, the patient might be struck by endocarditis after a visit to the dentist without using endocarditis prophylaxis. After all, he or she did not know the aortic valve was abnormal and hence leaking or stenotic, as the hemodynamic conditions are well tolerated and there were no symptoms [Figure 1]. In particular this scenario holds for congenital aortic regurgitation.
| Etiology and clinical presentation | | |
Congenital aortic valve regurgitation as isolated condition is rare and results from abnormal aortic valve development. The isolated condition has been described in mono-, bi- and tetracuspid valves [Figure 2]. More often, congenital aortic regurgitation results from other congenital heart diseases like subvalvular aortic membrane, subarterial ventricular septal defect, aneurysm of the sinus of Valsalva, as part of the Marfan syndrome or resulting from medication used by the mother during pregnancy [1],[2],[3].
Sometimes the murmur is detected immediately after birth, but, as the valve regurgitation itself is often well tolerated, it might remain unnoticed until adulthood [4],[5] . Therefore, the natural history of [3] the disease in younger patients is mainly influenced by the development of endocarditis. In the older patient early valve degeneration determines the clinical course. As mentioned before, the regurgitation is well tolerated and the patients do not have any complaints. In severe cases the regurgitation may lead to symptoms of heart failure, pounding headache, or nocturnal angina pectoris. This latter condition is caused by the diminished coronary perfusion pressure induced by a slow heart rate. Due to the long lasting diastole, the pressure within the left ventricle rises while the pressure in the aorta falls, hence coronary perfusion pressure fails and the subendocardial layers become anoxic.
| Diagnosis | | |
The diagnosis is made during auscultation by the characteristic diastolic decrescendo murmur. A soft first heart sound and a positive Durozier phenomenon indicate more severe regurgitation. The electrocardiogram may show left ventricular hypertrophy and a left ventricular diastolic strain pattern, represented by "T" wave inversion in the left precordial leads. These abnormalities however do not reflect the severity of the disease and cannot be used to guide intervention. The diagnosis is confirmed using color Doppler echocardiography by a regurgitant jet originating from the aortic valve. The severity of the regurgitation might be determined by the same characteristics as used in adult patients. An increase in left ventricular volume reflected by an increase of end systolic diameter to values equal with the corresponding normal end diastolic diameter for that age is an ominous sign. In addition, a short pressure half time of the regurgitant signal together with diastolic flow reversal in the abdominal aorta are hallmarks of severe aortic regurgitation. All these features however might be encountered in asymptomatic patients. In the past, cardiac catheterization was performed to exclude other associated abnormalities, but with modern echocardiographic equipment and pediatric transesophageal scope, this is no longer necessary.
| Treatment | | |
Medication in the treatment of these patients is restricted to afterload reduction. In particular treatment with nifedipine has been described to diminish the rate of progression of aortic valve regurgitation and to postpone valve replacement [6] Recently it has been suggested that treatment of factors known to induce coronary artery disease, may also have adverse effects on the rate of progression of valvular heart disease [7] . The main problem in the treatment of patients with congenital aortic regurgitation is optimum timing of intervention. As the hemodynamic effect are well tolerated, one has to pay attention to signs of left ventricular dysfunction, during regular follow up [8] . Nowadays, valve reconstruction is hardly performed and the long term results of these operations are not well known. The place of aortic root replacement by an aortic homograft is still undetermined. The treatment of choice is valve replacement by either the autologous pulmonary valve in a Ross procedure or replacement by a mechanical valve [9] . Tissue valves have the advantage of not needing oral anticoagulant therapy, but primary valve failure by calcification and valve deterioration especially in young patients prevent their general use [10] . The problem of surgical intervention at a younger age is that the patients might outgrow their valve and thus often a re-operation with additional risks is required [11] . Therefore, operation is deferred as long as possible and performed at the moment the patient develops symptoms. During the operation, aortic tissue has to be investigated for abnormalities in the elastic and fibromuscular tissue, as these patients tend to develop ascending aorta dilatation and even dissecting aneurysms [12] . After the operation, the patients have to be followed to monitor signs of patient valve mismatch. In the younger patients, pannus formation may also lead to an increase in gradients across the valve prosthesis. In additio, during follow up the diameter of the ascending aorta has to be monitored for dilatation and subsequent dissection of the aorta thoracalis.
| Conclusion | | |
Although congenital aortic regurgitation is often well tolerated in childhood and hardly needs treatment, it is necessary to follow these patients on a regular basis. Endocarditis prophylaxis is of paramount importance as these patients are at high risk, hence these patients have to be well-instructed. In adulthood, abnormally developed aortic valves degenerate earlier than normal valves to such an extent that valve replacement is obligatory. Signs of left ventricular dysfunction form the main reason to intervene. If possible, valve replacement should be deferred to adulthood to avoid patient valve mismatch and re-do operations.
| References | | |
| 1. | Motto M, Schneeweiss A, Shemlbv A, Benjamin P, Kaplinsky E, Hegesh J. Correlation of distance from subaortic membrane to base of the right aortic valve cusp and the development of aortic regurgitation in mild discrete subaortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1989;64:395 - 396.  |
| 2. | Van der Lee C, Roos-Hesselink JW, Bogers AJJC, McGhie JS, Spitads ESC. Klein ventrikelseptum defect, grote gevolgen. Cardiologie 2000;7:103-6. |
| 3. | Ando J, Kobayashi T, Sato R, Yasuda K. Congenital aortic regurgitation observed in a thalidomide-deformed child. Jpn Heart J 1978:19:823-827. |
| 4. | Donofrio MT, Engle MA, O'Loughlin, Snyder MS, Levin AR, Ehlers KH, Gold J. Congenital aortic regurgitation: natural history and management. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:366 - 372. |
| 5. | Progression of aortic valve dysfunction in 51 adult patients with congenital bicuspid aortic valve: assessment and follow up by Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J 1993;69:237 - 240. |
| 6. | Scognamiglio R, Rahimtoola SH, Fasoil G, Nistri S, Dalla Volta S. Nifedipine in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular function. N EngJ Med 1994;331:689 - 694. |
| 7. | Palta S, Pai AM, Gil KS, Pai RG. New insights into the progression of aortic stenosis. Implications for secondary prevention. Circulation 2000;101:2497 - 2502. |
| 8. | Bonow RO. Management ofcbronic aortic regurgitation. N Engi J Med 1994;331:736 -737. |
| 9. | Stelzer P, Elkins R. Pulmonary autograft: an American experience. J Card Surg 1987;2:429 - 433. |
| 10. | Hammermeister K, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, Grover FI., Oprian C, Rahimtoola S. Outcomes 15 years afb:er valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affair randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000 ; 36 :1152 - 1158. |
| 11. | Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical hnpact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1131 -1141. |
| 12. | Nicod P, Bioor (], Godfrey Mhollister D, Pyeritz RE, Dittrich H, Polikar R, Peterson KL. Familial aortic dissecting aneurysm. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13:811 - 819. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
|
