Login | Users Online: 666  
Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size   
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us
 


 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 256-262  

Clinical review: Management of patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction


1 Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland-Medical University of Bahrain, Busaiteen, Kingdom of Bahrain
2 Department of Cardiology, Sh. Mohammed Bin Khalifa Cardiac Center, Bahrain Defence Force Royal Medical Services, Kingdom of Bahrain

Date of Submission19-Mar-2020
Date of Acceptance28-Oct-2020
Date of Web Publication14-Jan-2021

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Mary Lynch
Department of Cardiology, Sh. Mohammed Bin Khalifa Cardiac Center, Bahrain Defence Force Royal Medical Services
Kingdom of Bahrain
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/HEARTVIEWS.HEARTVIEWS_41_20

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Aims: The aim was to assess the quality of practice provided to acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients at the cardiac center, within a specified time frame and identify possible areas of improvement.
Settings and Design: This is a retrospective standards-based clinical review, including adults diagnosed with acute STEMI between January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2017 of cases admitted and managed at the respective cardiac center.
Subjects and Methods: The study was designed according to recommendations provided by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines: “The acute management of myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation;” alongside, the local standard: door-to-balloon time ≤90 min, adopted from the American Heart Association.
Statistical Analysis Used: Data analysis was done through excel and SPSS for advanced statistical calculations. P < 0.05 was considered to be statically significant.
Results: In total, 277 patients were included in the study. About 72% underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention with 62 min as median door-to-balloon time. Door-to-balloon time >90 min was significantly higher when patients presented outside official hospital hours (P = 0.039). Transradial route was chosen in 77.7% of the cases.
Conclusions: Practice at the cardiac center was found to show good compliance with the guidelines. However, door-to-balloon time for procedures performed out of official hospital working hours was slightly outside the recommended limit.

Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome, acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction, door-to-needle time, door-to-balloon time, percutaneous coronary intervention, thrombolysis


How to cite this article:
Ali FA, Altahoo H, Lynch M. Clinical review: Management of patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Heart Views 2020;21:256-62

How to cite this URL:
Ali FA, Altahoo H, Lynch M. Clinical review: Management of patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Heart Views [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Feb 26];21:256-62. Available from: https://www.heartviews.org/text.asp?2020/21/4/256/307037




   Introduction Top


Atheromatous coronary artery disease is caused by atherosclerosis in patients predisposed to the condition by risk factors such as male gender, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and genetic traits. Atherosclerosis leads to the formation of plaques, which may result in reduced perfusion of cardiac tissues supplied by the diseased coronary artery. Myocardial infarction (MI) is caused by plaque rupture, initiation of the thrombotic cascade, and partial to total occlusion of the relevant coronary artery.[1]

ST-elevation MI (STEMI) involves complete occlusion of a coronary artery, most commonly as a result of a thrombus and can result in transmural MI.[2],[3]

The primary aim of acute STEMI management is the restoration of coronary blood supply as quickly as possible since the delay in reperfusion was found to be associated with increased risk of impaired left ventricular systolic function and death. The main reperfusion methods include primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), where reperfusion is achieved through mechanical techniques such as coronary angioplasty, thrombus extraction, and stenting and fibrinolysis through the administration of fibrinolytic drugs. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials has shown PPCI to be superior to fibrinolysis with lower mortality rates, re-infarction, and stroke; provided that the PPCI-related time delay is not excessive.[4],[5]

Factors that affect timely reperfusion include late presentation to the hospital, also termed patient-related delay, interhospital transfer times, and prolonged door-to-balloon inflation times at the PCI center.

Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death in Bahrain, comprising 13.4% of all deaths, killing 0.4 thousand people, with significantly the highest number of sum of years of life lost due to premature mortality in the year 2012 according to the latest WHO records.[6]

In this clinical review, we look at the management of acute STEMI in the recent clinical practice at the cardiac center, in particular, the different reperfusion strategies.

This study aims at critical evaluation of the most recent clinical practice, to identify possible grounds for improvement and improve clinical outcome.


   Subjects and Methods Top


Design and standards

This study is a retrospective, standards-based clinical review, assessing the acute management care provided to 277 patients admitted to the respective cardiac center with ST-elevation myocardial infection between January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2017. The study was designed according to recommendations provided by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines: “The acute management of myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation;”[7] alongside, the local standard: door-to-balloon time ≤90 min, adopted from the American Heart Association.[8]

The data were further divided into presentations within (7 am to 2 pm) and out of (2 pm to 7 am) official hospital office hours.

Study settings and inclusion and exclusion criteria

All adult cases (of 18 years or more), with a diagnosis of acute MI, who presented to, and were managed at the cardiac center, over the 12-month period between January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2017 were reviewed.

Only patients with discharge diagnosis of acute STEMI were included. Patients who underwent successful fibrinolysis at other hospitals and were referred to the cardiac center for further management were excluded.

Data collection and analysis

Data collection was carried out in March and April 2017, after receiving ethical approval from the respective cardiac center. Data was collected from electronic and manual patient records and was entered directly into Excel spreadsheet.

National ID numbers of cases in the inclusion criteria were recorded from the coronary care unit and were used to access patient files. Data analysis was done through excel and SPSS, IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. for advanced statistical calculations. P < 0.05 was considered to be statically significant.


   Results Top


Patient characteristics

In total, 278 cases met the inclusion criteria of the study; one case was excluded due to restricted file access (Very Important Personnel (VVIP) patient), making the total number of patient records reviewed 277 [Table 1]a.


Click here to view


All patients with discharge diagnosis of MI were initially diagnosed according to the universal definition of MI, based on suggestive electrocardiogram changes, cardiac enzymes, and presenting signs and symptoms. As recommended by the NICE guidelines, no patient was labeled eligible or ineligible for reperfusion based solely on their level of consciousness.

In total, 197 patients (71%) of patients received primary PCI, 12 patients (4%) received fibrinolysis, and 61 patients (22%) were offered rescue PCI after failed fibrinolysis (includes primary and referred patients). Eight (3%) patients did not receive reperfusion intervention as four had normal coronary arteries on angiography, three patients had expired in the catheter laboratory due to cardiogenic shock, and one had very late presentation (>24 h from symptom onset).

Of all cases, 64.3% arrived at the cardiac center outside the official working hours (7 am to 2 pm). Most of the cases managed for acute STEMI at the cardiac center are referrals from other hospitals, making treatment decision-making, outcomes, and transfer delay important factors affecting timely reperfusion in those patients [Figure 1]a.
Figure 1: (a) T he source of patients diagnosed with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction at the cardiac center from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2017. (b) Description of symptom onset times and record availability

Click here to view


Time of onset of chest pain to arrival at first medical contact, time was reviewed when the respective records were available (patient-related delay) (185 patients)

The NICE guidelines have different recommendations regarding the reperfusion management for patients presenting to the hospital within 12 h of symptom onset and those who exceed the 12 h, respectively. Hence, the data have been looked at accordingly [Table 1]b.

Our results indicate that 149 (53.8%) patients presented within 12 h of symptom onset [Figure 1]b, of which 76 were primary cases of the cardiac center and 73 were referrals from other hospitals. Of the patients with the first presentation within 12 h of symptom onset (76), 61 (80.3%) underwent primary PCI, successful fibrinolysis was administered to 10 patients, with median door-to-needle time (DTN time) of 21 min (range 5–37 min).

Thirty-six patients presented later than 12 h from symptom onset with continuing ischemia, of which six were referrals of failed fibrinolysis from other hospitals that were offered rescue PCI, and 30 primary cases, of which 29 received coronary angiography with follow-on PCI if indicated [Table 1]a.

Coronary angiography with appropriate PCI revascularization procedures was performed in all patients with cardiogenic shock, with the exception of one patient who expired shortly after admission in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

In total, 92 cases had no symptom onset record in the respective reviewed files, most of which were referrals. Therefore, they were not assessed for the NICE guideline recommendations that required symptom onset time.

Door-to-balloon times and delay

Our data were analyzed for distribution using the Shapiro–Wilk test and the results showed that the data were leptokurtic with significant positive skew (+6.99, P = 0.00 [<0.05]) indicating that the data are not normally distributed; therefore, the median was used to represent the data. One record of the door-to-balloon time was an extreme outlier due to patient factors and was excluded from the statistical calculations. This particular patient had extensive occlusion in the left anterior descending artery with previous coronary stenting and renal impairment. The patient was offered diagnostic angiogram, and the case was discussed for the CABG procedure, but the patient was eventually managed by PCI due to his co-morbidities.

In the course of the 12-month period, a total of 197 (72%) cases of acute STEMI underwent primary PCI at the cardiac center with a median door-to-balloon time of 62 min and PCI related delay of 41 min [Figure 2]a. Out of the 197 patients who underwent PCI, six patients did not have recorded PCI reports and therefore were excluded from the statistical calculations requiring the respective data.
Figure 2: (a) Description of total door-to-balloon times. (b) Description of the spread of arrival times of patients with door-to-balloon exceeding 90 min over the course of 24 h. (c) Description of the route of access chosen during percutaneous coronary intervention procedures performed and thrombus aspiration

Click here to view


A total of 115 patients presented to the cardiac center within 12 h of symptom onset and were managed by the primary PCI with median door-to-balloon time of 69 min and PCI related delay of 55 min. Two patients were excluded from this statistical calculation for missing PCI records [Table 2].
Table 2: Guideline standards and summary of results

Click here to view


In addition, to further assess and evaluate the quality of clinical practice, we looked at door-to-balloon times within and outside of normal hospital working hours (7 AM to 2 PM). Median door-to-balloon time within working hours was 61 min, compared to 99 min for cases presenting out of official working hours [Table 3].
Table 3: Percutaneous coronary intervention-related delay within and out of official working hours

Click here to view


Cross tabulation using Fisher exact showed that the number of cases with door-to-balloon time exceeding 90 min in patients arriving at the cardiac center after official working hours was significantly higher compared with those presenting within working hours.

(X2 (1,193) = 4.28, P = 0.039 [<0.05]).

The odds ratio (OR) test performed was suggestive of a strong association between working hours and door-to-balloon time exceeding 90 min (OR: 2.629, 95% confidence interval: 1.026–6.737).

[Figure 2]b shows the spread of cases that exceeded the recommended door-to-balloon time over the course of 24 h.

Route of access and thrombus aspiration

The route of entry in the PCI procedures and consideration of thrombus aspiration are described in [Figure 2]c. Majority (77.7%) of PCI procedures during the 12 months' period were transradial. The transfemoral route was chosen in 20.8% of the cases.

Thrombus aspiration was performed in 36% of patients.

Twenty (7.2%) patients diagnosed with acute STEMI expired on the index admission. The most frequent cause of death was cardiogenic shock. Delay in timely reperfusion could not be very well assessed in this group of patients since records of the time of symptom onset (patient-related delay) were not recorded in a significant number of transfer patients (57%).


   Discussion Top


NICE provides six areas of assessment as quality standards that contribute to the prevention of preventable premature mortality, of which three apply to clinical management of acute STEMI.[9] Through this study, the current practice at the cardiac center was found coherent with the provided recommendations.

Our study shows that 71% of all acute STEMI patients at the cardiac center undergo PPCI, which is the preferred method of reperfusion according to the NICE guidelines. Comparatively, the Gulf COAST registry shows that only 10% of all acute STEMI patients in Oman, Kuwait, UAE, and Bahrain undergo PPCI.[10]

For patients presenting within 12 h from symptom onset, the cardiac center has a compliance of 80.9% with local guidelines, as most patients were offered primary PCI with a door-to-balloon time <90 min. This shows that adherence in the respective cardiac center compares favorably to centers in neighboring Gulf countries, as door-to-balloon time <90 min has been achieved in only 70%, 60%, and 50% in UAE, Kuwait, and Oman, respectively.[10] The Gulf COAST registry, based on data collected between January 2012 and January 2013 documents that the compliance with recommendations for door-to-balloon time not exceeding 90 min was 81% in Bahrain.[10] As this figure is very close to the compliance between January 2016 and January 2017 (80.9%), it indicates that the implementation of new strategies is needed to increase the compliance over the coming years.

Furthermore, the cardiac center has 80.3% compliance with the NICE guidelines recommending that PPCI is used as the reperfusion method if PCI-related delay does not exceed 120 min, for patients presenting within 12 h of symptom onset (1.1.4).

Regarding patients who presented later than 12 h from symptom onset, the cardiac center has a compliance of 97%, as those patients were offered coronary angiogram with follow-on PCI if indicated.

In majority of the cases, primary PCI was offered, and in 77.7% of patients, the transradial approach was used [Table 2], as it is associated with reduced chance of access site bleeding which, in turn, has been associated with reduced overall complications.[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11] In addition, the transradial approach is associated with a shortened hospital stay, making it more economical than femoral access.[12] The transfemoral route was considered in highly critical patients for whom the transradial approach might not have been the most suitable choice in terms of procedural delay, use of intra-aortic balloon pump, and use of larger caliber PCI equipment not compatible with radial sheaths.

NICE guideline recommendations on thrombus aspiration were based on low- to very low-quality evidence lacking statistical strength, and therefore, it was not recommended to be routinely performed. Moreover, in two large-scale randomized control trials, comparison of the use of PCI alone versus PCI with routine thrombectomy has failed to demonstrate an improvement in the long-term outcome of procedures with thrombectomy in comparison with PCI alone. New evidence suggests that routine thrombus aspiration may be associated with stroke.[13],[14]

Fibrinolytic reperfusion was offered to patients with early presentation (arriving at the cardiac center within 1 h of symptom onset) and where it was assessed that performance of primary PCI would result in delay to reperfusion. All patients who were offered fibrinolysis were reperfused with DTN time of <40 min.

In efforts to improve the quality of care provided to acute STEMI patients, factors contributing to more desirable clinical outcomes have been extensively studied in the last couple of years. It has been shown that although shorter door-to-balloon time is a quality measure, its clinical benefit is confined to early presenting patients. Symptom onset-to-balloon time was suggested as a better measure of clinical outcome in patients with acute STEMI who receive PCI. Since door-to-balloon time is a fraction of the onset-to-balloon time, efforts in reducing delays in symptom onset to first medical contact should be considered.[5],[15]

The main limitation of this study was the lack of complete information in the respective patient files in some cases, especially symptom onset time for patients referred from other hospitals.


   Conclusions Top


Statistical results in this study provide evidence of good-quality clinical care in acute settings of ST-elevated MI with the center fulfilling recommended time criteria for primary PCI.

The center fulfilled the time criteria for the door-to-balloon time within hospital working hours (62 min) and just missed the recommended door-to-balloon inflation time of 90 min or less (99 min) for patients arriving outside of working hours when the performance of primary PCI requires that the PCI team be alerted from home and travel to the hospital for the procedure.

The small number of patients who received thrombolysis as the primary treatment at the cardiac center fulfilled the DTN time of 30 min or less.

Recommendations

  1. In light of a long DTB time during on call hours (99 min), studies suggest the development of an in-house 24/7 STEMI program that is available during working and on call hours. There is evidence that such teams are proven to apply timely and effective reperfusion, with the potential to achieve lower DTB time, especially during “on-call” hours[16]
  2. In a recent study analyzing the root causes of mortality in STEMI patients postprimary PCI, early recognition of MI symptoms by the patient and early seeking of health care was found to be among the top modifiable factors; therefore, we recommend that high-risk patients get sufficient education on the symptoms and signs of MI and be advised to seek medical help immediately[17],[18]
  3. A re-analysis is recommended within 2–3 years to assess for the implementation of solution plans for areas of improvement highlighted in this study, as well as general quality of care provided to acute STEMI patients.


Acknowledgment

We would like to show our gratitude to Dr. Salim Fredriks, PhD, RCSI Bahrain, for his precious assistance with the statistical analysis of our data. We are also immensely grateful to the Mohamed Bin Khalifa Cardiac Centre at the BDF hospital for approving this work. Our thanks also especially extend to staff in the cardiac catheter laboratories at the center for their constant support during the data collection period.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Ambrose JA, Singh M. Pathophysiology of coronary artery disease leading to acute coronary syndromes. F1000prime reports 2015.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
DeWood MA, Spores J, Notske R, et al. Prevalence of total coronary occlusion during the early hours of transmural myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine 1980.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Davies MJ, Thomas AC. Plaque fissuring--the cause of acute myocardial infarction, sudden ischaemic death, and crescendo angina. British Heart Journal 1985.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Huynh LT, Rankin JM, Tideman P, et al. Reperfusion therapy in the acute management of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction in Australia: findings from the ACACIA registry. Med J Aust 2010.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Shiomi H, Nakagawa Y, Morimoto T, et al. Association of onset to balloon and door to balloon time with long term clinical outcome in patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction having primary percutaneous coronary intervention: observational study. BMJ 2012.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Bahrain [Internet]. World Health Organization. 2017 Available from: http://www.who.int/countries/bhr/en/. [cited 1 April 2017].  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation: acute management | 1-recommendations | Guidance and guidelines | NICE [Internet]. Nice.org.uk. 2013 [cited 3 February 2017]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg167/chapter/1-recommendations American Heart Association. Recommendations for criteria for STEMI systems of care.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE, Chung MK, De Lemos JA, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2013  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Acute coronary syndromes in adults | Quality-statement-1-Diagnosis-of-acute-myocardial-infarction | Guidance and guidelines | NICE [Internet]. Nice.org.uk. 2017. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs68/chapter/Quality-statement-1-Diagnosis-of-acute-myocardial-infarction. [cited 1 April 2017].  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Zubaid M, Rashed W, Alsheikh-Ali AA, Garadah T, Alrawahi N, Ridha M, et al. Disparity in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction practices and outcomes in Arabian Gulf Countries (Gulf COAST Registry). Heart Views 2017.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Rodriguez-Leor O, Fernandez-Nofrerias E, Carrillo X, et al. Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience. American heart journal. 2013.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Vorobcsuk A, Kónyi A, Aradi D, Horváth IG, Ungi I, Louvard Y, et al. A. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: Systematic overview and meta-analysis. American heart journal. 2009.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Fröbert O, Lagerqvist B, Gudnason T, et al. Thrombus Aspiration in ST-Elevation myocardial infarction in Scandinavia (TASTE trial). A multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical registry trial based on the Swedish angiography and angioplasty registry (SCAAR) platform. Study design and rationale. American Heart Journal 2010  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Jolly SS, Cairns JA, Yusuf S, et al. Outcomes after thrombus aspiration for ST elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year follow-up of the prospective randomised TOTAL trial. The Lancet. 2016  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Dadu RT, El-Refai M, Davis A, Bobek J, Chiang IH, Alam M, Lakkis N. IMPACT OF SHORTER DOOR TO BALLOON TIME ON LEFT VENTRICULAR EJECTION FRACTION IN STEMI PATIENTS WHO PRESENT EARLY TO HOSPITAL. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2016;67:657-.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Fennessy M, Lopez J. The in-house team approach as part of the next phase in STEMI care [Internet]. 2013. p. 39-43. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-in-house-team-approach-as-part-of-the-next-in-Fennessy-Lopez/00c3b225d3242273e3d4df11a06a8f04ac0a10c6?p2df.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
El Sakr F, Kenaan M, Menees D, et al. Root Cause Analysis of Deaths in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarctions Treated With Primary PCI: What Can We Do Better?. The Journal of Invasive Cardiology 2017.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Dudek D, Rakowski T, Dziewierz A, Mielecki W. Time delay in primary angioplasty: how relevant is it?.  Back to cited text no. 18
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Subjects and Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed214    
    Printed6    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded12    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal